Posted in Articles on November 9, 2018
Source code disclosure via exposed .git folder
Posted in Articles on August 25, 2018
Hi, I recently found a .git folder exposed on a public bug bounty program and used it to reconstruct the Web app’s source code. I can’t disclose specific details yet, but wanted to share with you this tutorial on how to find and exploit this kind of bugs.
.git exposure can pay well or not, depending on the assets found. But it is interesting anyway because:
- It is very easy to detect
- Analyzing the source code can reveal other vulnerabilities that are even more critical and interesting
The process is the same whether you have a list of targets during a penetration test, or a broad scope (like *.example.com) when bug hunting.
If the scope is limited to a set of Web applications, skip to step2. Otherwise, use recon to make a list of Web apps:
Make a list of Web apps
Start with enumerating domains. Jason Haddix’s bug hunters methodology is a very good start.
Check acquisitions in particular. Let’s say the program’s acquisition rules say that acquisitions are in scope only after 6 months. Then if you test a new acquisition at month 7, you may have more chances to find bugs than on a one or two-year old acquisition. The new one is probably less tested than the main domain too.
Then enumerate subdomains using tools like Amass, Sublist3r or Massdns.
After that, identify web applications, by port scanning all ips found and manually browsing all HTTP/HTTPS services. Note that the same subdomain can host multiple Web applications, for example on different ports or URL paths.
Detect .git exposure using forced browsing
Once you have a solid list of Web applications, use forced browsing to see if a .git folder is accessible on them.
If file & directory bruteforce tools are allowed, you can use dirsearch or dirb (with common.txt dictionary). They both check for
If you get a 404 error, then .git/ doesn’t exist on the server. But if you get a 403 forbidden error, it does! The folder’s root just won’t be directly accessible if directory listing is disabled on the server:
If you’re lucky and directory listing is enabled, then you could directly browse the .git folder’s contents:
Confirm the bug by manually browsing the .git folder
If you “git clone” any Git project from Github and look at .git/ in its root you’ll notice that some file are always present:
You can confirm that the .git folder’s contents are accessible (even if .git/ itself isn’t) by trying to open these different common file names, for example:
Automatically extract contents of .git
This is the fun part! Browsing .git/ manually is good for proof of concept, but tedious. If you want to retrieve as many files as possible, even with directory listing disabled, the tool to use is GitTools.
It’s really good! Just 4 lines and you’ll have all or parts of the remote Git repository on your computer:
./gitdumper.sh https://example.com/.git/ /output-directory/
git status # Returns that the files were deleted because folders are empty
git checkout -- . # To restore the files & download the directory
git log # See what other commits are there
Finally, you have to analyze the local repository manually. Try to detect other vulnerabilities using static code analysis, or credentials, authentication tokens, new endpoints, etc.
And don’t forget, if you find a vulnerable domain, to check its development and staging subdomains too. They would probably be vulnerable, even if the bug was fixed on the main domain/subdomain.
- Finding new vulnerabilities by analyzing the source code
- Finding files containing sensitive information like credentials, tokens, new endpoints, etc
Examples of bug bounty reports
- Git repository found on Grabtaxi Holdings Pte Ltd ($1,000)
- Git available containing passwords. on Boozt Fashion AB ($400)
- [staging-engineering.gnip.com] Publicly accessible GIT directory on Twitter ($280)
- GIT Detected on Nextcloud ($0)
I hope this helps. If you have any questions, suggestions or requests, you know what to do!
See you next time!